<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1952 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466990</link>
    <description>Rule 27(4)(iv) of the Odisha Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016 was construed to require the income tax return for the immediately preceding completed financial year, not a year whose return-filing period had not yet expired, so the bidder&#039;s filing for 2020-2021 satisfied the condition and rejection for non-filing of 2021-2022 was unsustainable. In judicial review of the sand tender, the Court held that a misconstruction of tender conditions that excluded the highest bidder and reduced public revenue justified intervention; the impugned judgment and rejection were set aside, a fresh auction was ordered, and restitutionary relief with refund was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1952 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466990</link>
      <description>Rule 27(4)(iv) of the Odisha Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016 was construed to require the income tax return for the immediately preceding completed financial year, not a year whose return-filing period had not yet expired, so the bidder&#039;s filing for 2020-2021 satisfied the condition and rejection for non-filing of 2021-2022 was unsustainable. In judicial review of the sand tender, the Court held that a misconstruction of tender conditions that excluded the highest bidder and reduced public revenue justified intervention; the impugned judgment and rejection were set aside, a fresh auction was ordered, and restitutionary relief with refund was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>