https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466994 PMLA proceedings require a subsisting proceeds-of-crime basis from a scheduled offence, but an ECIR is only an internal investigative document and is not ordinarily quashable in writ jurisdiction. Where the predicate consolidated FIRs were stayed, coercive investigation could not continue against those FIRs, though independent FIRs could still sustain the ECIR to that extent. A writ challenge to search and seizure under PMLA was not entertained because it involved disputed facts and an alternate remedy before the Adjudicating Authority existed. Open-ended non-bailable warrants were set aside because the record did not show evasion or sufficient need for coercive process. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:19:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466994 PMLA proceedings require a subsisting proceeds-of-crime basis from a scheduled offence, but an ECIR is only an internal investigative document and is not ordinarily quashable in writ jurisdiction. Where the predicate consolidated FIRs were stayed, coercive investigation could not continue against those FIRs, though independent FIRs could still sustain the ECIR to that extent. A writ challenge to search and seizure under PMLA was not entertained because it involved disputed facts and an alternate remedy before the Adjudicating Authority existed. Open-ended non-bailable warrants were set aside because the record did not show evasion or sufficient need for coercive process. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466994