https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466995 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act barred bail because the complaint disclosed a detailed prima facie case of money laundering, and the twin conditions for release were not satisfied. The Court held that 127 days in custody did not amount to prolonged incarceration warranting bail on Article 21 or speedy-trial grounds. Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was refused because the prosecution complaint was filed within time and was treated as a complete final report despite curable defects. Medical bail was declined since the ailments could be treated in custody, and alleged arrest irregularities under Section 19 PMLA were found unsupported on the record. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2026 13:15:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466995 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act barred bail because the complaint disclosed a detailed prima facie case of money laundering, and the twin conditions for release were not satisfied. The Court held that 127 days in custody did not amount to prolonged incarceration warranting bail on Article 21 or speedy-trial grounds. Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was refused because the prosecution complaint was filed within time and was treated as a complete final report despite curable defects. Medical bail was declined since the ailments could be treated in custody, and alleged arrest irregularities under Section 19 PMLA were found unsupported on the record. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466995