https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466988 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable against a show-cause notice issued by the competent authority for cancellation of a lease deed under the M.P. Land Revenue Code. The notice was issued within jurisdiction under Section 115, and no lack of competence was shown. Interference at the notice stage was therefore unwarranted, especially because the petitioner could submit a detailed reply and the authority was expected to decide the matter by a reasoned order. The challenge was declined at the threshold. en-us Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 01 Mar 2026 09:39:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466988 A writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable against a show-cause notice issued by the competent authority for cancellation of a lease deed under the M.P. Land Revenue Code. The notice was issued within jurisdiction under Section 115, and no lack of competence was shown. Interference at the notice stage was therefore unwarranted, especially because the petitioner could submit a detailed reply and the authority was expected to decide the matter by a reasoned order. The challenge was declined at the threshold. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466988