<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening of assessment requires fresh tangible material showing escaped income; identical adjudicated transactions cannot be reassessed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97294</link>
    <description>Reopening an income-tax assessment for the identical bank-deposit transaction already investigated and finally adjudicated is impermissible where the subsequent authority relies on the same material; the doctrine Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa bars subjecting the assessee to duplicate adjudication. The court reiterates that a notice under section 148 requires &quot;reasons to believe&quot; grounded in tangible material with a nexus to escaped income and cannot be based on mere suspicion or a change of opinion. The reassessment attempt was self conflicting and set aside; the writ petition was allowed, preventing a second assessment on the same subject matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 14:01:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 14:01:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening of assessment requires fresh tangible material showing escaped income; identical adjudicated transactions cannot be reassessed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97294</link>
      <description>Reopening an income-tax assessment for the identical bank-deposit transaction already investigated and finally adjudicated is impermissible where the subsequent authority relies on the same material; the doctrine Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa bars subjecting the assessee to duplicate adjudication. The court reiterates that a notice under section 148 requires &quot;reasons to believe&quot; grounded in tangible material with a nexus to escaped income and cannot be based on mere suspicion or a change of opinion. The reassessment attempt was self conflicting and set aside; the writ petition was allowed, preventing a second assessment on the same subject matter.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 14:01:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>