<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing methods: Bright Line Test rejected; limited ALP uplift ordered using adjusted TNMM comparability margin.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97288</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing dispute over benchmarking of AMP expenses and appropriate ALP method: the Bright Line Test (BLT) adjustments are held legally unsustainable and deleted; the Cost Plus method is rejected as unjustified because the assessee acted as a distributor incurring routine business promotion and employee costs that should form part of trading cost; the tribunal accepts comparability under adjusted TNMM and directs an ALP uplift equal to the difference between the comparable PLI and the assessee&#039;s margin, instructing the AO to compute and apply that limited adjustment in line with the cited Sony Ericsson precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:58:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing methods: Bright Line Test rejected; limited ALP uplift ordered using adjusted TNMM comparability margin.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97288</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing dispute over benchmarking of AMP expenses and appropriate ALP method: the Bright Line Test (BLT) adjustments are held legally unsustainable and deleted; the Cost Plus method is rejected as unjustified because the assessee acted as a distributor incurring routine business promotion and employee costs that should form part of trading cost; the tribunal accepts comparability under adjusted TNMM and directs an ALP uplift equal to the difference between the comparable PLI and the assessee&#039;s margin, instructing the AO to compute and apply that limited adjustment in line with the cited Sony Ericsson precedent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:58:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>