<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50362</link>
    <description>The amended Central Excise Tariff Heading 3003.31 required classification of medicaments manufactured exclusively in accordance with formulae in authoritative Ayurvedic books listed in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Dant Manjan Lal was manufactured according to the formula in Ayurved Sar Sangraha, which was included in that Schedule, so the revised entry governed its classification. The earlier Supreme Court approach under the pre-amendment tariff, based on common trade understanding and therapeutic or prophylactic use, did not control the amended regime. On that basis, the product was classifiable as an ayurvedic medicament under Heading 30.03 and not as a tooth powder for oral hygiene.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50362</link>
      <description>The amended Central Excise Tariff Heading 3003.31 required classification of medicaments manufactured exclusively in accordance with formulae in authoritative Ayurvedic books listed in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Dant Manjan Lal was manufactured according to the formula in Ayurved Sar Sangraha, which was included in that Schedule, so the revised entry governed its classification. The earlier Supreme Court approach under the pre-amendment tariff, based on common trade understanding and therapeutic or prophylactic use, did not control the amended regime. On that basis, the product was classifiable as an ayurvedic medicament under Heading 30.03 and not as a tooth powder for oral hygiene.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>