<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1331 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787183</link>
    <description>Valuation for central excise must follow the transaction value principle: the price actually paid or payable is the assessable value and cannot be retrospectively revalued by applying average prices from a different period; therefore revaluation based on average sale prices from sample invoices is impermissible. Allegations of clandestine manufacture, clandestine removals or dual pricing require direct, tangible and corroborative evidence (e.g., unexplained input consumption, excess production records, discovery of unaccounted goods, transport and sales proceeds); mere sample invoices or internal records without corroboration are insufficient. Application of MRP is inappropriate where bulk or free supplies lacked MRP. Denial of SSI exemption lacked evidentiary foundation and is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1331 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787183</link>
      <description>Valuation for central excise must follow the transaction value principle: the price actually paid or payable is the assessable value and cannot be retrospectively revalued by applying average prices from a different period; therefore revaluation based on average sale prices from sample invoices is impermissible. Allegations of clandestine manufacture, clandestine removals or dual pricing require direct, tangible and corroborative evidence (e.g., unexplained input consumption, excess production records, discovery of unaccounted goods, transport and sales proceeds); mere sample invoices or internal records without corroboration are insufficient. Application of MRP is inappropriate where bulk or free supplies lacked MRP. Denial of SSI exemption lacked evidentiary foundation and is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>