<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1334 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787186</link>
    <description>A Bill of Entry remains a valid document for Cenvat credit where the imported inputs are duty-paid, actually received, and used in manufacture, even if the document was originally not in the recipient&#039;s name but was endorsed by the importer. Endorsement does not, by itself, negate the evidentiary value of the Bill of Entry under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, credit was allowed and the demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1334 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787186</link>
      <description>A Bill of Entry remains a valid document for Cenvat credit where the imported inputs are duty-paid, actually received, and used in manufacture, even if the document was originally not in the recipient&#039;s name but was endorsed by the importer. Endorsement does not, by itself, negate the evidentiary value of the Bill of Entry under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, credit was allowed and the demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>