https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787189 A constitutional challenge was raised to Rule 16 and Rule 22(3) of the Chewing Tobacco, Jarda Scented Tobacco and Gutkha Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2026 on grounds of legislative competence and arbitrariness, along with a challenge to the disclosure requirement in Form CE DEC-01 concerning CCTV surveillance details. The matter was not finally decided at this stage; notice was issued and the case was directed to be listed for further hearing. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787189 A constitutional challenge was raised to Rule 16 and Rule 22(3) of the Chewing Tobacco, Jarda Scented Tobacco and Gutkha Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2026 on grounds of legislative competence and arbitrariness, along with a challenge to the disclosure requirement in Form CE DEC-01 concerning CCTV surveillance details. The matter was not finally decided at this stage; notice was issued and the case was directed to be listed for further hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787189