<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50357</link>
    <description>Under the Modvat scheme, Rule 57C applies where final products are exempt or nil-rated, while Rule 57CC addresses common inputs used for both dutiable and exempt clearances. Where the assessee had already reversed the input credit before clearance of the intermediate product, no retained credit remained in its hands, so the liability contemplated by either rule was not attracted. A demand based solely on Rule 57CC in those circumstances would amount to double recovery. The note states that such a demand was therefore not sustainable against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50357</link>
      <description>Under the Modvat scheme, Rule 57C applies where final products are exempt or nil-rated, while Rule 57CC addresses common inputs used for both dutiable and exempt clearances. Where the assessee had already reversed the input credit before clearance of the intermediate product, no retained credit remained in its hands, so the liability contemplated by either rule was not attracted. A demand based solely on Rule 57CC in those circumstances would amount to double recovery. The note states that such a demand was therefore not sustainable against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>