<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1378 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787230</link>
    <description>Challenge concerns validity of a faceless assessment completed before issuance of the administrative notification operationalising the faceless-assessment provision; legal analysis contrasts statutory insertion of faceless assessment with the later administrative notification and treats jurisdiction as dependent on the notification&#039;s issuance, relying on coordinate and High Court precedents addressing identical timing issues; factual posture involves reopening under the reassessment provisions after a return filed under the ordinary filing provision; conclusion stated in the text is that the faceless assessment completed prior to the notification was without jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1378 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787230</link>
      <description>Challenge concerns validity of a faceless assessment completed before issuance of the administrative notification operationalising the faceless-assessment provision; legal analysis contrasts statutory insertion of faceless assessment with the later administrative notification and treats jurisdiction as dependent on the notification&#039;s issuance, relying on coordinate and High Court precedents addressing identical timing issues; factual posture involves reopening under the reassessment provisions after a return filed under the ordinary filing provision; conclusion stated in the text is that the faceless assessment completed prior to the notification was without jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>