https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787238 A writ challenge to dismissal of a GST statutory appeal was rejected for delay and laches where the petitioner had received notice, sought adjournment, and then failed to pursue the matter diligently for years. The Court treated the long, unexplained inactivity as decisive, noting that the later communication merely confirmed that the appeal had already been dismissed in March 2020. The suspension of limitation during the COVID period did not excuse the petitioner's lack of follow-up after limitation resumed. The challenge was therefore found not maintainable, and the petitioner's negligence in pursuing the remedy was held fatal to relief. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787238 A writ challenge to dismissal of a GST statutory appeal was rejected for delay and laches where the petitioner had received notice, sought adjournment, and then failed to pursue the matter diligently for years. The Court treated the long, unexplained inactivity as decisive, noting that the later communication merely confirmed that the appeal had already been dismissed in March 2020. The suspension of limitation during the COVID period did not excuse the petitioner's lack of follow-up after limitation resumed. The challenge was therefore found not maintainable, and the petitioner's negligence in pursuing the remedy was held fatal to relief. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787238