<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 230 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50354</link>
    <description>Rebate under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held admissible where duty-paid goods were exported from a sales depot rather than directly from the factory, because the governing Board circular permitted export from a place outside the factory premises subject to Central Excise officer satisfaction. The deviation from factory-based export was treated as a technical breach that did not affect the substance of the rebate claim, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 230 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50354</link>
      <description>Rebate under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held admissible where duty-paid goods were exported from a sales depot rather than directly from the factory, because the governing Board circular permitted export from a place outside the factory premises subject to Central Excise officer satisfaction. The deviation from factory-based export was treated as a technical breach that did not affect the substance of the rebate claim, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>