https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787245 Petitions seeking withdrawal of specified Special Leave Petitions were allowed and those SLPs were dismissed as withdrawn. Delay in filing another SLP diary entry was examined and condoned. The Court applied its discretionary appellate jurisdiction under constitutional extraordinary review and found no sufficient ground to disturb the impugned orders; accordingly the remaining Special Leave Petitions were dismissed for lack of merit. Outcomes: (a) identified SLPs dismissed as withdrawn, and (b) delayed SLP condoned but dismissed on merits with no interference under the Court's discretionary review power. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:41:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787245 Petitions seeking withdrawal of specified Special Leave Petitions were allowed and those SLPs were dismissed as withdrawn. Delay in filing another SLP diary entry was examined and condoned. The Court applied its discretionary appellate jurisdiction under constitutional extraordinary review and found no sufficient ground to disturb the impugned orders; accordingly the remaining Special Leave Petitions were dismissed for lack of merit. Outcomes: (a) identified SLPs dismissed as withdrawn, and (b) delayed SLP condoned but dismissed on merits with no interference under the Court's discretionary review power. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787245