<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1608 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466961</link>
    <description>Appellate stay of an NCLT interim order was imposed pending appeal because the impugned interim directions risked indirectly implementing the MOU before an arbitrator finally adjudicated the family settlement; the appellate analysis emphasised the existence of an arbitration clause and that the company petitions were already listed for final hearing. The appellate court directed the tribunal to take up the connected company petitions on the fixed date or with only short adjournments and to endeavour to dispose of them as early as possible, preferably within one month, while the earlier stay continues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1608 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466961</link>
      <description>Appellate stay of an NCLT interim order was imposed pending appeal because the impugned interim directions risked indirectly implementing the MOU before an arbitrator finally adjudicated the family settlement; the appellate analysis emphasised the existence of an arbitration clause and that the company petitions were already listed for final hearing. The appellate court directed the tribunal to take up the connected company petitions on the fixed date or with only short adjournments and to endeavour to dispose of them as early as possible, preferably within one month, while the earlier stay continues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>