<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1582 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466970</link>
    <description>Documentary verification and departmental remand support can discharge the assessee&#039;s burden for unsecured loans under section 68, so the addition could not be sustained once loan confirmations were found prima facie in order. Likewise, consultancy fees supported by confirmation, income-tax returns, financial statements, and tax deduction at source under section 194J were accepted on factual verification because the recipient&#039;s identity and the nature of the expenditure were established. The ITAT Mumbai accordingly treated both additions as unsustainable on the evidence and held that the revenue had not rebutted the material or displaced the appellate findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1582 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466970</link>
      <description>Documentary verification and departmental remand support can discharge the assessee&#039;s burden for unsecured loans under section 68, so the addition could not be sustained once loan confirmations were found prima facie in order. Likewise, consultancy fees supported by confirmation, income-tax returns, financial statements, and tax deduction at source under section 194J were accepted on factual verification because the recipient&#039;s identity and the nature of the expenditure were established. The ITAT Mumbai accordingly treated both additions as unsustainable on the evidence and held that the revenue had not rebutted the material or displaced the appellate findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>