<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1774 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466972</link>
    <description>Notices issued under Section 148A and Section 148 and consequent assessments under Section 147 were held procedurally invalid because they were not initiated in the faceless manner required by post-2020 amendments and related notification; therefore those jurisdictional notices and resultant assessment orders are quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The court recognised the Revenue&#039;s reserved liberty to re-initiate proceedings in compliance with the amended faceless scheme and made relief subject to the outcome of pending Special Leave Petitions, permitting either party to seek revival in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 08:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1774 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466972</link>
      <description>Notices issued under Section 148A and Section 148 and consequent assessments under Section 147 were held procedurally invalid because they were not initiated in the faceless manner required by post-2020 amendments and related notification; therefore those jurisdictional notices and resultant assessment orders are quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The court recognised the Revenue&#039;s reserved liberty to re-initiate proceedings in compliance with the amended faceless scheme and made relief subject to the outcome of pending Special Leave Petitions, permitting either party to seek revival in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>