<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Beneficial ownership and benami transactions upheld where unexplained cash repayments and accommodated LC entries camouflaged proceeds of crime.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97236</link>
    <description>The text addresses provisional attachment of property alleged to be purchased using proceeds of crime through a bank loan, focusing on beneficial ownership and benami transactions. It explains that accommodated LC discounting transactions were used to generate illicit funds, that recorded witness statements implicated the arranger and beneficiaries, and that loan disbursement and EMI repayments were effected by unexplained cash deposits traced to the arranger. On that factual matrix the adjudicating authority confirmed attachment and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 12:57:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 12:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Beneficial ownership and benami transactions upheld where unexplained cash repayments and accommodated LC entries camouflaged proceeds of crime.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97236</link>
      <description>The text addresses provisional attachment of property alleged to be purchased using proceeds of crime through a bank loan, focusing on beneficial ownership and benami transactions. It explains that accommodated LC discounting transactions were used to generate illicit funds, that recorded witness statements implicated the arranger and beneficiaries, and that loan disbursement and EMI repayments were effected by unexplained cash deposits traced to the arranger. On that factual matrix the adjudicating authority confirmed attachment and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 12:57:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>