<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>If not now, then when ?. Part nine under GST Laws</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15936</link>
    <description>The article emphasizes failures in notice service under GST where portal &quot;additional notices&quot; postings were used instead of primary delivery methods, causing adjudication orders to be unknown to the taxpayer; a High Court found merit in challenges premised on defective service and procedural safeguards and ordered the lifting of a bank attachment imposed pursuant to the ineffectively served adjudication order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:12:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>If not now, then when ?. Part nine under GST Laws</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15936</link>
      <description>The article emphasizes failures in notice service under GST where portal &quot;additional notices&quot; postings were used instead of primary delivery methods, causing adjudication orders to be unknown to the taxpayer; a High Court found merit in challenges premised on defective service and procedural safeguards and ordered the lifting of a bank attachment imposed pursuant to the ineffectively served adjudication order.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:12:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>