<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787127</link>
    <description>Incentives paid by a manufacturer to an authorised dealer for meeting sales targets are trade discounts forming part of the sale consideration and not consideration for a service; accordingly they are not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service. The analysis applies the principal-to-principal character of dealership arrangements, treats the manufacturer-to-dealer and dealer-to-customer transactions as sales with incentives reducing the sale value, and relies on the exclusion of transfer of property in goods from the definition of service under Section 66D. Operatively, service tax demands based on classifying such incentives as business auxiliary services are unsustainable and were set aside, and the appeals allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787127</link>
      <description>Incentives paid by a manufacturer to an authorised dealer for meeting sales targets are trade discounts forming part of the sale consideration and not consideration for a service; accordingly they are not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service. The analysis applies the principal-to-principal character of dealership arrangements, treats the manufacturer-to-dealer and dealer-to-customer transactions as sales with incentives reducing the sale value, and relies on the exclusion of transfer of property in goods from the definition of service under Section 66D. Operatively, service tax demands based on classifying such incentives as business auxiliary services are unsustainable and were set aside, and the appeals allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>