<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1282 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787134</link>
    <description>Whether provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act related to property equivalent to identified proceeds was valid: the tribunal treated admissions, corroborative witness statements and contemporaneous banking and transaction records (including loan disbursal, demand draft payments and repeated cash deposits used to repay loan EMIs) as establishing that the appellant received proceeds and arranged repayments, demonstrating beneficial ownership and camouflage of proceeds; on that evidential basis the provisional attachment&#039;s link to proceeds of crime was sustained and the confirmation of provisional attachment was upheld, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1282 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787134</link>
      <description>Whether provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act related to property equivalent to identified proceeds was valid: the tribunal treated admissions, corroborative witness statements and contemporaneous banking and transaction records (including loan disbursal, demand draft payments and repeated cash deposits used to repay loan EMIs) as establishing that the appellant received proceeds and arranged repayments, demonstrating beneficial ownership and camouflage of proceeds; on that evidential basis the provisional attachment&#039;s link to proceeds of crime was sustained and the confirmation of provisional attachment was upheld, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>