<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 244 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50339</link>
    <description>Exemption for parts of battle tanks was confined to goods falling within the specified tariff chapters and capable of identification as such parts. Insulated wires and cables cleared in running length were not shown to be identifiable battle tank parts, and their general utility meant they could be used for other purposes as well. On that reasoning, the exemption was held unavailable for the cables and wires, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 244 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50339</link>
      <description>Exemption for parts of battle tanks was confined to goods falling within the specified tariff chapters and capable of identification as such parts. Insulated wires and cables cleared in running length were not shown to be identifiable battle tank parts, and their general utility meant they could be used for other purposes as well. On that reasoning, the exemption was held unavailable for the cables and wires, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>