<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1310 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787162</link>
    <description>The note addresses whether NIH project sub-grants remitted to a US university are applications of income for a tied charitable project or disallowable as application outside India, and whether such remittances attract disallowance as payments to specified persons. It clarifies that where grant funds are contractually earmarked for foreign co investigators, those amounts constitute diversion by overriding title and are excluded from the assessee&#039;s free income for exemption purposes; conversely, disallowance under the specified person rule requires factual establishment that the foreign recipient falls within the specified person description. The remittance shortfall was limited to the actual deficiency for one assessment year; other years were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 15:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1310 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787162</link>
      <description>The note addresses whether NIH project sub-grants remitted to a US university are applications of income for a tied charitable project or disallowable as application outside India, and whether such remittances attract disallowance as payments to specified persons. It clarifies that where grant funds are contractually earmarked for foreign co investigators, those amounts constitute diversion by overriding title and are excluded from the assessee&#039;s free income for exemption purposes; conversely, disallowance under the specified person rule requires factual establishment that the foreign recipient falls within the specified person description. The remittance shortfall was limited to the actual deficiency for one assessment year; other years were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>