<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1313 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787165</link>
    <description>Whether the penalty is time barred: the Assessing Officer&#039;s reference to the competent authority on 25/05/2023 constitutes the triggering event for limitation under the applicable provision, making the penalty order dated 27/09/2024 time barred and quashed in favour of the assessee. Whether penalty merits sustain: penal liability requires tangible, transaction wise evidence that the assessee received cash in contravention of the cash receipt prohibition; consolidated week wise aggregated excel entries and admissions without date wise, buyer wise transaction particulars did not establish contravention, so the penalty was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1313 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787165</link>
      <description>Whether the penalty is time barred: the Assessing Officer&#039;s reference to the competent authority on 25/05/2023 constitutes the triggering event for limitation under the applicable provision, making the penalty order dated 27/09/2024 time barred and quashed in favour of the assessee. Whether penalty merits sustain: penal liability requires tangible, transaction wise evidence that the assessee received cash in contravention of the cash receipt prohibition; consolidated week wise aggregated excel entries and admissions without date wise, buyer wise transaction particulars did not establish contravention, so the penalty was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>