https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787182 Petition challenges validity of notifications issued under the CGST regime contending non-compliance with the statutory recommendation requirement and the legality of extending limitation for recovery actions; identical questions are pending in connected proceedings including before the apex court. The court observed those parallel proceedings and granted interim relief to preserve the status quo, staying the impugned administrative order dated 23 August 2024 and restraining coercive measures such as blocking of the electronic credit ledger and attachments pending final disposal of the petition. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:36:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787182 Petition challenges validity of notifications issued under the CGST regime contending non-compliance with the statutory recommendation requirement and the legality of extending limitation for recovery actions; identical questions are pending in connected proceedings including before the apex court. The court observed those parallel proceedings and granted interim relief to preserve the status quo, staying the impugned administrative order dated 23 August 2024 and restraining coercive measures such as blocking of the electronic credit ledger and attachments pending final disposal of the petition. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787182