https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466931 Alleged inter-state arrest without prior intimation to the local police, compliance with the arrest protocol, or communication of the grounds of arrest raised a prima facie concern of procedural irregularity. The Court noted that the chronology suggested the petitioner may have been picked up before the relevant information was recorded in Uttar Pradesh, and that no prior notice had been given to the Delhi Police. Applying the established inter-state arrest safeguards, the Court found the prescribed procedure had not apparently been followed and granted interim protection by directing production of the petitioner before the Court if he was not released on bail by the Magistrate, together with preservation and production of available CCTV footage. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:35:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466931 Alleged inter-state arrest without prior intimation to the local police, compliance with the arrest protocol, or communication of the grounds of arrest raised a prima facie concern of procedural irregularity. The Court noted that the chronology suggested the petitioner may have been picked up before the relevant information was recorded in Uttar Pradesh, and that no prior notice had been given to the Delhi Police. Applying the established inter-state arrest safeguards, the Court found the prescribed procedure had not apparently been followed and granted interim protection by directing production of the petitioner before the Court if he was not released on bail by the Magistrate, together with preservation and production of available CCTV footage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466931