<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 223 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim under Section 18 of the Customs Act, due to provisional assessment and unjust enrichment. The appellant was entitled to a refund of Rs. 1,01,06,333/- as the excess duty paid was to be adjusted against the duty finally assessed, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that unjust enrichment principles do not apply in cases where provisional assessments become final.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 223 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim under Section 18 of the Customs Act, due to provisional assessment and unjust enrichment. The appellant was entitled to a refund of Rs. 1,01,06,333/- as the excess duty paid was to be adjusted against the duty finally assessed, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that unjust enrichment principles do not apply in cases where provisional assessments become final.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>