<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1574 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466948</link>
    <description>Entitlement to deduction under Section 80-IB(10) turned on whether the taxpayer acted as developer/builder or merely as contractor; the tribunal applied a substance-over-form test, emphasising approvals, infrastructure development, marketing, assumption of development risk and cost, agreements with buyers prescribing construction specifications and retention of title/possession until full payment, and delivery of completed residential units. Registered sale-deeds executed for financing did not negate the parties&#039; contractual arrangements or conduct. On these factual and legal points the tribunal treated the assessee as a developer and allowed the deduction for the years in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1574 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466948</link>
      <description>Entitlement to deduction under Section 80-IB(10) turned on whether the taxpayer acted as developer/builder or merely as contractor; the tribunal applied a substance-over-form test, emphasising approvals, infrastructure development, marketing, assumption of development risk and cost, agreements with buyers prescribing construction specifications and retention of title/possession until full payment, and delivery of completed residential units. Registered sale-deeds executed for financing did not negate the parties&#039; contractual arrangements or conduct. On these factual and legal points the tribunal treated the assessee as a developer and allowed the deduction for the years in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>