<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1749 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466955</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed whether cash receipt on sale of agricultural land attracts penalty for prohibited cash advances and whether the seller established reasonable cause to avoid penalty. It applied the principle that bona fide, registered sales disclosed in return and lacking material of mala fide intent or tax evasion can constitute reasonable cause to negate penalty under the statutory penalty regime; accordingly the penalty was deleted on merits. The tribunal also considered limitation, noting statutory extensions that kept the penalty order within the extended period, but this temporal finding did not prevent deletion of the penalty on substantive grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1749 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466955</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed whether cash receipt on sale of agricultural land attracts penalty for prohibited cash advances and whether the seller established reasonable cause to avoid penalty. It applied the principle that bona fide, registered sales disclosed in return and lacking material of mala fide intent or tax evasion can constitute reasonable cause to negate penalty under the statutory penalty regime; accordingly the penalty was deleted on merits. The tribunal also considered limitation, noting statutory extensions that kept the penalty order within the extended period, but this temporal finding did not prevent deletion of the penalty on substantive grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>