https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466929 An accused on bail in a cheque dishonour complaint who failed to appear, travelled outside India without permission, and sought cancellation of warrants in absentia could not resist coercive process. The court noted the absence of an authorised counsel, a valid vakalatnama, and traceable surety, and found that non-bailable warrants and proclamation were justified. The challenge was rejected and the impugned orders were left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:15:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466929 An accused on bail in a cheque dishonour complaint who failed to appear, travelled outside India without permission, and sought cancellation of warrants in absentia could not resist coercive process. The court noted the absence of an authorised counsel, a valid vakalatnama, and traceable surety, and found that non-bailable warrants and proclamation were justified. The challenge was rejected and the impugned orders were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466929