<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50326</link>
    <description>Rule 57B credit on furnace oil remained subject to the restriction in Notification No. 14/97-C.E. (N.T.) because Rule 57B, though containing a non obstante clause, operated within the framework of Rule 57A. Since Rule 57B did not independently specify the duty, the meaning of &quot;specified duty&quot; had to be traced to the Rule 57A notification, and the 10% ad valorem cap continued to apply. Full Modvat credit on furnace oil was therefore not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50326</link>
      <description>Rule 57B credit on furnace oil remained subject to the restriction in Notification No. 14/97-C.E. (N.T.) because Rule 57B, though containing a non obstante clause, operated within the framework of Rule 57A. Since Rule 57B did not independently specify the duty, the meaning of &quot;specified duty&quot; had to be traced to the Rule 57A notification, and the 10% ad valorem cap continued to apply. Full Modvat credit on furnace oil was therefore not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>