https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787073 Application to amend the cause title to implead a necessary party was permitted, applying principles that amendments of parties should favour adjudication on merits over hyper-technical dismissal; outcome: dismissal for non-joinder was modified to allow impleader within two weeks. The reasoning invoked procedural powers to add or strike parties under Order I (Rules 9, 10(2), 13) of the CPC, the tribunal's duty under the Companies Act to follow principles of natural justice rather than rigid CPC procedures, protection of fundamental rights under Article 21, and balancing of prejudice by allowing respondents to file counter after amendment. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787073 Application to amend the cause title to implead a necessary party was permitted, applying principles that amendments of parties should favour adjudication on merits over hyper-technical dismissal; outcome: dismissal for non-joinder was modified to allow impleader within two weeks. The reasoning invoked procedural powers to add or strike parties under Order I (Rules 9, 10(2), 13) of the CPC, the tribunal's duty under the Companies Act to follow principles of natural justice rather than rigid CPC procedures, protection of fundamental rights under Article 21, and balancing of prejudice by allowing respondents to file counter after amendment. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787073