<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 192 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of pre-mutilated garments but upheld the confiscation of old and used items requiring a specific license. Redemption fines were reduced to 25% of the goods&#039; value, and penalties were adjusted to 5% of the goods&#039; value in each appeal, following precedents for similar cases. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 192 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of pre-mutilated garments but upheld the confiscation of old and used items requiring a specific license. Redemption fines were reduced to 25% of the goods&#039; value, and penalties were adjusted to 5% of the goods&#039; value in each appeal, following precedents for similar cases. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>