<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1235 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787087</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 148 was invalid where additions were based on material seized from the search of another person, yet the Assessing Officer invoked the deeming fiction applicable to a search in the assessee&#039;s own case. The statutory framework required the officer to proceed under the correct clause for third-party search material, record the requisite satisfaction, and obtain prior approval before issuing notice. Because those jurisdictional steps were not followed and the recorded reasons did not meet the reopening conditions, the notice lacked legal validity and the resulting assessment was vitiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1235 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787087</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 148 was invalid where additions were based on material seized from the search of another person, yet the Assessing Officer invoked the deeming fiction applicable to a search in the assessee&#039;s own case. The statutory framework required the officer to proceed under the correct clause for third-party search material, record the requisite satisfaction, and obtain prior approval before issuing notice. Because those jurisdictional steps were not followed and the recorded reasons did not meet the reopening conditions, the notice lacked legal validity and the resulting assessment was vitiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>