<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787090</link>
    <description>Whether an industrial unit qualifies for deduction under Section 80-IC turned on whether its activities amounted to &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; and whether the unit resulted from splitting-up/reconstruction. The unit&#039;s processing, calibration, assembly and testing produced a commercially distinct integrated engine cooling module with substantial value addition and multiple technical stages, satisfying &#039;manufacture/production&#039; under Section 80-IC(2)(a); inter-unit transfers showed no pricing infirmity. Evidence of increased capacity and continued output established expansion rather than splitting-up, so Section 80-IC(4)(i) was not breached. Consequence: the unit met conditions for the Section 80-IC deduction and disallowances were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787090</link>
      <description>Whether an industrial unit qualifies for deduction under Section 80-IC turned on whether its activities amounted to &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; and whether the unit resulted from splitting-up/reconstruction. The unit&#039;s processing, calibration, assembly and testing produced a commercially distinct integrated engine cooling module with substantial value addition and multiple technical stages, satisfying &#039;manufacture/production&#039; under Section 80-IC(2)(a); inter-unit transfers showed no pricing infirmity. Evidence of increased capacity and continued output established expansion rather than splitting-up, so Section 80-IC(4)(i) was not breached. Consequence: the unit met conditions for the Section 80-IC deduction and disallowances were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>