<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1248 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787100</link>
    <description>Separate provisions for rural and non-rural advances were treated as permissible under section 36(1)(viia) for set-off of bad debts under section 36(1)(vii). The text also records that interest income on securities held by the assessee accrues on the due date of payment of interest, not on a day-to-day basis. On these points, the Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1248 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787100</link>
      <description>Separate provisions for rural and non-rural advances were treated as permissible under section 36(1)(viia) for set-off of bad debts under section 36(1)(vii). The text also records that interest income on securities held by the assessee accrues on the due date of payment of interest, not on a day-to-day basis. On these points, the Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>