<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retraction of confession rejected where delayed and uncorroborated; corroboration sustained, confiscation upheld and penalty reduced.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97185</link>
    <description>Retraction of confession was rejected as belated and unsupported, and the tribunal treated voluntariness and admissibility by relying on an unretracted statement that corroborated the appellant&#039;s earlier admissions; independent seizure of cash from the corroborating declarant&#039;s residence further supported the finding. The appellant failed to prove lawful import of gold. Consequentially the confiscation of the seized sum to the Central Government was upheld, while the penalty was reduced to 2,01,000 with any verified pre-deposit adjusted against the reduced penalty; the appeal was partly allowed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retraction of confession rejected where delayed and uncorroborated; corroboration sustained, confiscation upheld and penalty reduced.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97185</link>
      <description>Retraction of confession was rejected as belated and unsupported, and the tribunal treated voluntariness and admissibility by relying on an unretracted statement that corroborated the appellant&#039;s earlier admissions; independent seizure of cash from the corroborating declarant&#039;s residence further supported the finding. The appellant failed to prove lawful import of gold. Consequentially the confiscation of the seized sum to the Central Government was upheld, while the penalty was reduced to 2,01,000 with any verified pre-deposit adjusted against the reduced penalty; the appeal was partly allowed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:35:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>