<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 216 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50316</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied only where exempted goods were sold, because the provision required an amount equal to 8% of the price charged on clearance from the factory or similar sale channels. A transfer of exempted intermediate goods to another unit of the same manufacturer, without sale or consideration, did not satisfy that statutory condition. The definition of sale under the Central Excise Act supported this reading, and the fact that the goods remained available for use in manufacture of dutiable final products in the transferee unit meant there was no basis for further reversal of credit. Any independent computation on the buyer&#039;s sale price was therefore inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 216 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50316</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied only where exempted goods were sold, because the provision required an amount equal to 8% of the price charged on clearance from the factory or similar sale channels. A transfer of exempted intermediate goods to another unit of the same manufacturer, without sale or consideration, did not satisfy that statutory condition. The definition of sale under the Central Excise Act supported this reading, and the fact that the goods remained available for use in manufacture of dutiable final products in the transferee unit meant there was no basis for further reversal of credit. Any independent computation on the buyer&#039;s sale price was therefore inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>