<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eligible Assessee under Section 144C(15)(b) includes non-resident individuals, sustaining assessment and dismissal of writ petition.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97162</link>
    <description>The article explains that the Finance Act 2020 amendment (effective 01.04.2020) expanded the definition of &quot;eligible assessee&quot; in Section 144C(15)(b) to include non-resident individuals, so the petitioner (an NRI) qualified as an eligible assessee at the time of the Section 148 notice; proceedings before the Dispute Resolution Panel under Section 144C extended limitation via Section 153, and the petitioner&#039;s post hoc Section 154 rectification was treated as an afterthought. The court found estoppel by the petitioner&#039;s conduct (including filing objections) and refused the challenge to jurisdiction absent a Transfer Order under Section 127, dismissing the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:53:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eligible Assessee under Section 144C(15)(b) includes non-resident individuals, sustaining assessment and dismissal of writ petition.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97162</link>
      <description>The article explains that the Finance Act 2020 amendment (effective 01.04.2020) expanded the definition of &quot;eligible assessee&quot; in Section 144C(15)(b) to include non-resident individuals, so the petitioner (an NRI) qualified as an eligible assessee at the time of the Section 148 notice; proceedings before the Dispute Resolution Panel under Section 144C extended limitation via Section 153, and the petitioner&#039;s post hoc Section 154 rectification was treated as an afterthought. The court found estoppel by the petitioner&#039;s conduct (including filing objections) and refused the challenge to jurisdiction absent a Transfer Order under Section 127, dismissing the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:53:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>