<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasonableness of salary: increased remuneration upheld where expanded duties, experience and managing-committee approval justify payment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97155</link>
    <description>Issue concerns denial of exemption under charitable-trust law for part of salary paid to a specified officer on grounds of excessiveness; the legal point applied is assessment of reasonableness of remuneration by reference to role, responsibilities and relevant experience. The increase in salary was held to correspond to expanded duties and proven industry experience, and was approved by the entity&#039;s managing committee; as a result the challenged disallowance was not sustained and the payment was treated as reasonable for exemption purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:51:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasonableness of salary: increased remuneration upheld where expanded duties, experience and managing-committee approval justify payment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97155</link>
      <description>Issue concerns denial of exemption under charitable-trust law for part of salary paid to a specified officer on grounds of excessiveness; the legal point applied is assessment of reasonableness of remuneration by reference to role, responsibilities and relevant experience. The increase in salary was held to correspond to expanded duties and proven industry experience, and was approved by the entity&#039;s managing committee; as a result the challenged disallowance was not sustained and the payment was treated as reasonable for exemption purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:51:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>