<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Classification of women&#039;s jackets as woven, not knitted, upheld; penalty for fraud/collusion rejected and reassessment permitted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97150</link>
    <description>Imported women&#039;s jackets were held to be woven not knitted; therefore classification under Customs Chapter 62 (heading 6202 93 90) is correct and revenue succeeds on classification. The article explains distinguishing woven from knitted garments and rejects the importer&#039;s self-declared knitted classification. However, the tribunal found the misclassification arose from erroneous self-assessment rather than fraud, collusion or willful misstatement; consequently extended limitation for duty recovery and penalty liability under the fraud/collusion standard cannot be invoked. Overall outcome: classification upheld for revenue, but penalty and extended-period enforcement were not sustained; appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Classification of women&#039;s jackets as woven, not knitted, upheld; penalty for fraud/collusion rejected and reassessment permitted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97150</link>
      <description>Imported women&#039;s jackets were held to be woven not knitted; therefore classification under Customs Chapter 62 (heading 6202 93 90) is correct and revenue succeeds on classification. The article explains distinguishing woven from knitted garments and rejects the importer&#039;s self-declared knitted classification. However, the tribunal found the misclassification arose from erroneous self-assessment rather than fraud, collusion or willful misstatement; consequently extended limitation for duty recovery and penalty liability under the fraud/collusion standard cannot be invoked. Overall outcome: classification upheld for revenue, but penalty and extended-period enforcement were not sustained; appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:47:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>