<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1161 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787013</link>
    <description>Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act is only a machinery provision for assessment and recovery and does not create a statutory first charge on a corporate debtor&#039;s assets. Because no first charge arises under the CST Act, CST dues cannot be treated as secured debt in insolvency proceedings, unlike a situation where a statute such as the Gujarat VAT Act expressly creates a first charge. On that basis, rejection of the resolution plan and declaration of the State Tax Officer as a secured creditor were legally unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the resolution plan approval process was restored before the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1161 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787013</link>
      <description>Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act is only a machinery provision for assessment and recovery and does not create a statutory first charge on a corporate debtor&#039;s assets. Because no first charge arises under the CST Act, CST dues cannot be treated as secured debt in insolvency proceedings, unlike a situation where a statute such as the Gujarat VAT Act expressly creates a first charge. On that basis, rejection of the resolution plan and declaration of the State Tax Officer as a secured creditor were legally unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the resolution plan approval process was restored before the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>