https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50301 Subsequent administrative instructions from the Board were held not to constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a revenue appeal. The explanation rested on later directions to appeal in matters where Jawahar Mills had been followed, but the relevant appellate order had not followed that decision and the department had already accepted the order-in-appeal without challenging it in time. On those facts, the delay was not condoned, the condonation application was rejected, and the appeal was also rejected. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:14:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50301 Subsequent administrative instructions from the Board were held not to constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a revenue appeal. The explanation rested on later directions to appeal in matters where Jawahar Mills had been followed, but the relevant appellate order had not followed that decision and the department had already accepted the order-in-appeal without challenging it in time. On those facts, the delay was not condoned, the condonation application was rejected, and the appeal was also rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50301