<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1755 - ITAT VARANASI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466883</link>
    <description>Tribunal appeal jurisdiction is determined by the location of the assessing officer who passed the assessment order. Where that officer was located in Delhi, an appeal filed by the revenue before the Varanasi bench was not competent; the proper forum was the Delhi benches of the Tribunal. The revenue could file a fresh appeal before the proper benches and seek condonation of delay, if advised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 21:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1755 - ITAT VARANASI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466883</link>
      <description>Tribunal appeal jurisdiction is determined by the location of the assessing officer who passed the assessment order. Where that officer was located in Delhi, an appeal filed by the revenue before the Varanasi bench was not competent; the proper forum was the Delhi benches of the Tribunal. The revenue could file a fresh appeal before the proper benches and seek condonation of delay, if advised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>