<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 183 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50296</link>
    <description>Excise duty demands cannot rest on conjectural production estimates drawn solely from a raw-material-to-output ratio when the record does not show uniform or reliable evidence and ignores relevant production variables. A single qualified employee statement, supported only by limited dealer evidence, is also insufficient to fix product-mix or grade-wise output without objective corroboration such as testing or comparable material. Unexplained dealer receipts cannot independently sustain a duty demand unless undervaluation or unaccounted clearance is first proved by reliable evidence. The article states that such demands were unsustainable on the facts discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 183 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50296</link>
      <description>Excise duty demands cannot rest on conjectural production estimates drawn solely from a raw-material-to-output ratio when the record does not show uniform or reliable evidence and ignores relevant production variables. A single qualified employee statement, supported only by limited dealer evidence, is also insufficient to fix product-mix or grade-wise output without objective corroboration such as testing or comparable material. Unexplained dealer receipts cannot independently sustain a duty demand unless undervaluation or unaccounted clearance is first proved by reliable evidence. The article states that such demands were unsustainable on the facts discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>