<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 145 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50295</link>
    <description>A duty demand cannot be confirmed beyond the scope of the show cause notice, so the enlarged demand was not sustainable. Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was to operate only as reflected in the notice, and the department could not deny its benefit altogether on a later view that the initial clearances should be counted differently. Where duty remained payable, admissible Modvat credit on inputs had to be allowed subject to verification, and the demand was required to be re-quantified after giving effect to that credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:49:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 145 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50295</link>
      <description>A duty demand cannot be confirmed beyond the scope of the show cause notice, so the enlarged demand was not sustainable. Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was to operate only as reflected in the notice, and the department could not deny its benefit altogether on a later view that the initial clearances should be counted differently. Where duty remained payable, admissible Modvat credit on inputs had to be allowed subject to verification, and the demand was required to be re-quantified after giving effect to that credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>