<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 188 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for cash discount, interest on receivables, special discount, cost of transportation from depots to buyers, cost of packing, and excess realization on account of freight. However, deductions for transportation costs from depot to depot were not allowed. The majority decision was in favor of the appellants, citing settled legal positions and relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:05:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 188 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for cash discount, interest on receivables, special discount, cost of transportation from depots to buyers, cost of packing, and excess realization on account of freight. However, deductions for transportation costs from depot to depot were not allowed. The majority decision was in favor of the appellants, citing settled legal positions and relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>