<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1144 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786996</link>
    <description>Assessing Officer&#039;s issuance of a provisional withholding certificate treating receipts as royalty/fees for technical services was set aside for lack of reasoned application of the legal tests distinguishing Section 44BB-style income from Section 44DA-style FTS/royalty; the Court required the AO to assess whether receipts in substance fell within the contractual and definitional exclusions applicable to seismic survey services and to address binding precedent and prior consistent treatment before directing withholding. Outcome: certificate directing withholding at the higher rate was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh, reasoned consideration within three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 08:36:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1144 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786996</link>
      <description>Assessing Officer&#039;s issuance of a provisional withholding certificate treating receipts as royalty/fees for technical services was set aside for lack of reasoned application of the legal tests distinguishing Section 44BB-style income from Section 44DA-style FTS/royalty; the Court required the AO to assess whether receipts in substance fell within the contractual and definitional exclusions applicable to seismic survey services and to address binding precedent and prior consistent treatment before directing withholding. Outcome: certificate directing withholding at the higher rate was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh, reasoned consideration within three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>