<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1113 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786965</link>
    <description>The SC recorded that the appellant&#039;s counsel relied on the respondent&#039;s affidavit stating that the subject goods would not be imported, and that any future import would be assessed under tariff item 85235100 as determined by the appellant. In light of that statement, the Court noted that the civil appeals no longer survived for consideration on merits and disposed of them as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1113 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786965</link>
      <description>The SC recorded that the appellant&#039;s counsel relied on the respondent&#039;s affidavit stating that the subject goods would not be imported, and that any future import would be assessed under tariff item 85235100 as determined by the appellant. In light of that statement, the Court noted that the civil appeals no longer survived for consideration on merits and disposed of them as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>